@article{adam2009logical,
  title={A logical formalization of the OCC theory of emotions},
  author={Adam, Carole and Herzig, Andreas and Longin, Dominique},
  journal={Synthese},
  volume={168},
  number={2},
  pages={201--248},
  year={2009},
  publisher={Springer}
}

@inproceedings{dastani2012logic,
  title={A logic of emotions: from appraisal to coping.},
  author={Dastani, Mehdi and Lorini, Emiliano},
  booktitle={AAMAS},
  pages={1133--1140},
  year={2012}
}

@article{walmsley2016cognitive,
  title={Cognitive biases in visual pilots' weather-related decision making},
  author={Walmsley, Stephen and Gilbey, Andrew},
  journal={Applied Cognitive Psychology},
  volume={30},
  number={4},
  pages={532--543},
  year={2016},
  publisher={Wiley Online Library}
}

@incollection{hoffman1998can,
  title={How can expertise be defined? Implications of research from cognitive psychology},
  author={Hoffman, Robert R},
  booktitle={Exploring expertise},
  pages={81--100},
  year={1998},
  publisher={Springer}
}

@TECHREPORT{BEA,
  title={BEA f-cp090601},
  institution={Bureau d’Enquêtes et d’Analyses pour la sécurité de l’aviation civile},
  year={2012}}
  
@inbook{gardenfors1995,
author = {Gärdenfors, Peter and Rott, Hans},
year = {1995},
month = {04},
pages = {35-132},
title = {Belief Revision},
volume = {4},
_isbn = {0198537913},
journal = {Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming}
}
  
  
@TECHREPORT{Wassermann00analgorithm,
    author = {Renata Wassermann},
    title = {An Algorithm for Belief Revision},
    _institution = {In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR2000)},
    year = {2000}
}
  
@article{REITER198757,
title = "A theory of diagnosis from first principles",
journal = "Artificial Intelligence",
volume = "32",
number = "1",
pages = "57 - 95",
year = "1987",
_issn = "0004-3702",
_doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(87)90062-2",
_url = "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0004370287900622",
author = "Raymond Reiter",
abstract = "Suppose one is given a description of a system, together with an observation of the system's behaviour which conflicts with the way the system is meant to behave. The diagnostic problem is to determine those components of the system which, when assumed to be functioning abnormally, will explain the discrepancy between the observed and correct system behaviour. We propose a general theory for this problem. The theory requires only that the system be described in a suitable logic. Moreover, there are many such suitable logics, e.g. first-order, temporal, dynamic, etc. As a result, the theory accommodates diagnostic reasoning in a wide variety of practical settings, including digital and analogue circuits, medicine, and database updates. The theory leads to an algorithm for computing all diagnoses, and to various results concerning principles of measurement for discriminating among competing diagnoses. Finally, the theory reveals close connections between diagnostic reasoning and nonmonotonic reasoning."
}


@article{liffiton2008algorithms,
  title={Algorithms for computing minimal unsatisfiable subsets of constraints},
  author={Liffiton, Mark H and Sakallah, Karem A},
  journal={Journal of Automated Reasoning},
  volume={40},
  number={1},
  pages={1--33},
  year={2008},
  publisher={Springer}
}

@article {Tversky1124,
	author = {Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel},
	title = {Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases},
	volume = {185},
	number = {4157},
	pages = {1124--1131},
	year = {1974},
	_doi = {10.1126/science.185.4157.1124},
	publisher = {American Association for the Advancement of Science},
	abstract = {This article described three heuristics that are employed in making judgements under uncertainty: (i) representativeness, which is usually employed when people are asked to judge the probability that an object or event A belongs to class or process B; (ii) availability of instances or scenarios, which is often employed when people are asked to assess the frequency of a class or the plausibility of a particular development; and (iii) adjustment from an anchor, which is usually employed in numerical prediction when a relevant value is available. These heuristics are highly economical and usually effective, but they lead to systematic and predictable errors. A better understanding of these heuristics and of the biases to which they lead could improve judgements and decisions in situations of uncertainty.},
	issn = {0036-8075},
	_URL = {https://science.sciencemag.org/content/185/4157/1124},
	_eprint = {https://science.sciencemag.org/content/185/4157/1124.full.pdf},
	journal = {Science}
}


@book{Todd1999,
author = {Todd, Peter and Czerlinski, Jean and Davis, Jennifer and Gigerenzer, Gerd and Goldstein, Daniel and Goodie, Adam and Hertwig, Ralph and Hoffrage, Ulrich and Laskey, Kathryn and Martignon, Laura and Miller, Geoffrey},
year = {1999},
month = {01},
pages = {},
title = {Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart}
}


@ARTICLE{Dimara2020,

  author={E. {Dimara} and S. {Franconeri} and C. {Plaisant} and A. {Bezerianos} and P. {Dragicevic}},

  journal={IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics}, 

  title={A Task-Based Taxonomy of Cognitive Biases for Information Visualization}, 

  year={2020},

  volume={26},

  number={2},

  pages={1413-1432},

  _doi={10.1109/TVCG.2018.2872577}}



@article{Goldszlagier2015,
author = {Goldszlagier, Julien},
year = {2015},
month = {01},
pages = {507},
title = {L'effet d'ancrage ou l'apport de la psychologie cognitive à l'étude de la décision judiciaire},
volume = {N° 4},
journal = {Les Cahiers de la Justice},
_doi = {10.3917/cdlj.1504.0507}
}

@article{Sullivan2018,
  title={Cognitive bias in clinical medicine},
  author={O’Sullivan, ED and Schofield, SJ},
  journal={JR Coll Physicians Edinb},
  volume={48},
  number={3},
  pages={225--32},
  year={2018}
}

@article{mynatt1977confirmation,
  title={Confirmation bias in a simulated research environment: An experimental study of scientific inference},
  author={Mynatt, Clifford R and Doherty, Michael E and Tweney, Ryan D},
  journal={Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology},
  volume={29},
  number={1},
  pages={85--95},
  year={1977},
  publisher={SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England}
}



@article{nickerson1998confirmation,
  title={Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises},
  author={Nickerson, Raymond S},
  journal={Review of general psychology},
  volume={2},
  number={2},
  pages={175--220},
  year={1998},
  publisher={SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA}
}


@article{murata2015influence,
  title={Influence of cognitive biases in distorting decision making and leading to critical unfavorable incidents},
  author={Murata, Atsuo and Nakamura, Tomoko and Karwowski, Waldemar},
  journal={Safety},
  volume={1},
  number={1},
  pages={44--58},
  year={2015},
  publisher={Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute}
}


@article{takano1999psychological,
  title={Psychological biases affecting human cognitive performance in dynamic operational environments},
  author={Takano, Kenichi and Reason, James},
  journal={Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology},
  volume={36},
  number={11},
  pages={1041--1051},
  year={1999},
  publisher={Taylor \& Francis}
}


@article{alchourron1985logic,
  title={On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions},
  author={Alchourr{\'o}n, Carlos E and G{\"a}rdenfors, Peter and Makinson, David},
  journal={The journal of symbolic logic},
  volume={50},
  number={2},
  pages={510--530},
  year={1985},
  publisher={Cambridge University Press}
}

@article{tsoukias2008decision,
  title={From decision theory to decision aiding methodology},
  author={Tsouki{\`a}s, Alexis},
  journal={European Journal of Operational Research},
  volume={187},
  number={1},
  pages={138--161},
  year={2008},
  publisher={Elsevier}
}

@article{davidsson2002agent,
  title={Agent based social simulation: A computer science view},
  author={Davidsson, Paul},
  journal={Journal of artificial societies and social simulation},
  volume={5},
  number={1},
  year={2002}
}

@article{voinson2015beyond,
  title={Beyond rational decision-making: modelling the influence of cognitive biases on the dynamics of vaccination coverage},
  author={Voinson, Marina and Billiard, Sylvain and Alvergne, Alexandra},
  journal={PloS one},
  volume={10},
  number={11},
  year={2015},
  publisher={Public Library of Science}
}


@article{kulick2003modeling,
  title={Modeling Adversaries and Related Cognitive Biases},
  author={Kulick, Jonathan and Davis, Paul K},
  journal={Modeling Adversaries and Related Cognitive Biases},
  year={2003},
  publisher={RAND Corporation}
}


@inproceedings{arnaud2017role,
  TITLE = {{The role of cognitive biases in reactions to bushfires}},
  AUTHOR = {Arnaud, Ma{\"e}l and Adam, Carole and Dugdale, Julie},
  _URL = {https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02116079},
  BOOKTITLE = {{ISCRAM}},
  ADDRESS = {Albi, France},
  YEAR = {2017},
  MONTH = May,
  KEYWORDS = {Multi-agent modelling ; social simulation ; cognitive biases ; BDI paradigm ; Victoria bushfires},
  PDF = {https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02116079/file/ISCRAM17_cog_bias-author-version.pdf},
  HAL_ID = {halshs-02116079},
  HAL_VERSION = {v1},
}

@article{CESCHI2019188,
title = {Dimensions of decision-making: An evidence-based classification of heuristics and biases},
journal = {Personality and Individual Differences},
volume = {146},
pages = {188-200},
year = {2019},
issn = {0191-8869},
_doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.033},
_url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886918304288},
author = {Andrea Ceschi and Arianna Costantini and Riccardo Sartori and Joshua Weller and Annamaria {Di Fabio}},
keywords = {Heuristics and Biases, Decision-Making, Individual differences, Mindware gaps, Positive Illusions, Negativity effect, Anchoring and Adjustment},
abstract = {Traditionally, studies examining decision-making heuristics and biases (H&B) have focused on aggregate effects using between-subjects designs in order to demonstrate violations of rationality. Although H&B are often studied in isolation from others, emerging research has suggested that stable and reliable individual differences in rational thought exist, and similarity in performance across tasks are related, which may suggest an underlying phenotypic structure of decision-making skills. Though numerous theoretical and empirical classifications have been offered, results have been mixed. The current study aimed to clarify this research question. Participants (N = 289) completed a battery of 17 H&B tasks, assessed with a within-subjects design, that we selected based on a review of prior empirical and theoretical taxonomies. Exploratory and confirmatory analyses yielded a solution that suggested that these biases conform to a model composed of three dimensions: Mindware gaps, Valuation biases (i.e., Positive Illusions and Negativity effect), and Anchoring and Adjustment. We discuss these findings in relation to proposed taxonomies and existing studies on individual differences in decision-making.}
}


@article{novaes,
author = {Novaes, Catarina and Veluwenkamp, Herman},
year = {2016},
month = {12},
pages = {},
title = {Reasoning Biases, Non-Monotonic Logics and Belief Revision},
volume = {83},
journal = {Theoria},
_doi = {10.1111/theo.12108}
}

@article{Ferme2011,
author = {Fermé, Eduardo and Hansson, Sven Ove},
year = {2011},
month = {04},
pages = {295-331},
title = {AGM 25 Years: Twenty-Five Years of Research in Belief Change},
volume = {40},
journal = {Journal of Philosophical Logic},
_doi = {10.2307/41487515}
}

@article{macleod1986attentional,
  title={Attentional bias in emotional disorders.},
  author={MacLeod, Colin and Mathews, Andrew and Tata, Philip},
  journal={Journal of abnormal psychology},
  volume={95},
  number={1},
  pages={15},
  year={1986},
  publisher={American Psychological Association}
}

@inbook{staw_1996, place={Cambridge}, series={Cambridge Series on Judgment and Decision Making}, title={The escalation of commitment: An update and appraisal}, _doi={10.1017/CBO9780511584169.011}, booktitle={Organizational Decision Making}, publisher={Cambridge University Press}, author={Staw, Barry M.}, editor={Shapira, ZurEditor}, year={1996}, pages={191--215}, collection={Cambridge Series on Judgment and Decision Making}}

@inproceedings{conversy:hal-01089633,
  TITLE = {{L'accident du vol AF447 Rio-Paris, un cas d'{\'e}tude pour la recherche en IHM}},
  AUTHOR = {Conversy, St{\'e}phane and al.},
  _URL = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01089633},
  BOOKTITLE = {{IHM'14, 26e conf{\'e}rence francophone sur l'Interaction Homme-Machine}},
  _ADDRESS = {Lille, France},
  PUBLISHER = {{ACM}},
  PAGES = {60-69},
  YEAR = {2014},
  MONTH = Oct,
  KEYWORDS = {Models of HCI ; Aviation ; Accident},
  PDF = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01089633v2/file/p60-conversy.pdf},
  HAL_ID = {hal-01089633},
  HAL_VERSION = {v2},
}

@article{postman1965short,
  title={Short-term temporal changes in free recall},
  author={Postman, Leo and Phillips, Laura W},
  journal={Quarterly journal of experimental psychology},
  volume={17},
  number={2},
  pages={132--138},
  year={1965},
  publisher={Taylor \& Francis}
}

@article{moore2008trouble,
  title={The trouble with overconfidence.},
  author={Moore, Don A and Healy, Paul J},
  journal={Psychological review},
  volume={115},
  number={2},
  pages={502},
  year={2008},
  publisher={American Psychological Association}
}

@book{kahneman2011thinking,
  title={Thinking, fast and slow},
  author={Kahneman, Daniel},
  year={2011},
  publisher={Macmillan}
}

@article{Stanovich1998,
author = {Stanovich, Keith and West, Richard},
year = {1998},
month = {07},
pages = {193-230},
title = {Cognitive Ability and Variation in Selection Task Performance},
volume = {4},
journal = {Thinking and Reasoning},
doi = {10.1080/135467898394139}
}

@article{Mcelroy2007,
author = {Mcelroy, Todd and Dowd, Keith},
year = {2007},
month = {02},
pages = {48-53},
title = {Susceptibility to anchoring effects: How openness-to-experience influences responses to anchoring cues},
volume = {2},
journal = {Judgment and Decision Making}
}

@article{Oreg2009,
author = {Oreg, Shaul and Bayazit, Mahmut},
year = {2009},
month = {09},
pages = {175-193},
title = {Prone to Bias: Development of a Bias Taxonomy From an Individual Differences Perspective},
volume = {13},
journal = {Review of General Psychology},
doi = {10.1037/a0015656}
}

@article{Slugosky1993,
author = {Ben R. Slugoski and Heather A. Shields and Kim A. Dawson},
title ={Relation of Conditional Reasoning to Heuristic Processing},
journal = {Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin},
volume = {19},
number = {2},
pages = {158-166},
year = {1993},
doi = {10.1177/0146167293192004},

URL = { 
        https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293192004
    
},
eprint = { 
        https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293192004
    
}
,
    abstract = { Wyer and Srull have proposed that a tendency to treat conditional relationships between events as if they were biconditional underlies a number of familiar biases in human social judgment. This hypothesis was tested in a factor-analytic study in which 111 subjects completed seven measures of heuristic use and three measures of conditional reasoning. A principal components analysis of the measures revealed two main factors, corresponding to an availability dimension and a representativeness dimension. There was no evidence for the hypothesis that the disposition to infer "Y is X" given "X is Y" underlies either dimension, although one measure of conditional reasoning, Wason's selection task, was related to both. This result is discussed in terms of Evans's two-stage (heuristic/analytic processing) model of reasoning. }
}

@article{Weaver2012,
author = {Weaver, Elise A. and Stewart, Thomas R.},
title = {Dimensions of Judgment: Factor Analysis of Individual Differences},
journal = {Journal of Behavioral Decision Making},
volume = {25},
number = {4},
pages = {402-413},
keywords = {judgment, individual differences, reasoning, problem solving, probability, cognitive ability, performance},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.748},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bdm.748},
eprint = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/bdm.748},
abstract = {ABSTRACT In this paper, we explore a pattern of individual differences in performance on judgment tasks. One hundred participants completed a battery of standard judgment tasks, including multiple cue judgment and tasks based on the “heuristics and biases” and problem-solving literature. Participants also completed tests of fluid and crystallized intelligence, forward digit span memory, and multiple cue probability learning. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated a two-factor structure underlying performance on these tasks and tests. The two moderately correlated factors reflected a distinction between tasks requiring accurate judgments based on multiple cues (correspondence tasks) and those requiring coherent judgments (coherence tasks), in which probabilities are compared and combined. Measures of fluid and crystallized intelligence and forward digit span memory were correlated with both factors but were more associated with correspondence than with coherence. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley \& Sons, Ltd.},
year = {2012}
}


@article{TEOVANOVIC201575,
title = "Individual differences in cognitive biases: Evidence against one-factor theory of rationality",
journal = "Intelligence",
volume = "50",
pages = "75 - 86",
year = "2015",
issn = "0160-2896",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.02.008",
url = "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289615000380",
author = "Predrag Teovanović and Goran Knežević and Lazar Stankov",
keywords = "Cognitive biases, Rationality, Judgment and decision making, Intelligence, Factor analysis",
abstract = "In this paper we seek to gain an improved understanding of the structure of cognitive biases and their relationship with measures of intelligence and relevant non-cognitive constructs. We report on the outcomes of a study based on a heterogeneous set of seven cognitive biases --- anchoring effect, belief bias, overconfidence bias, hindsight bias, base rate neglect, outcome bias and sunk cost effect. New scales for the assessment of these biases were administered to 243 undergraduate students along with measures of fluid (Gf) and crystallized (Gc) intelligence, a Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT), Openness/Intellect (O/I) scale and Need for Cognition (NFC) scale. The expected experimental results were confirmed --- i.e., each normatively irrelevant variable significantly influenced participants' responses. Also, with the exception of hindsight bias, all cognitive biases showed satisfactory reliability estimates (αs>.70). However, correlations among the cognitive bias measures were low (rs<.20). Although exploratory factor analysis produced two factors, their robustness was doubtful. Cognitive bias measures were also relatively independent (rs<.25) from the Gf, Gc, CRT, O/I and NFC and they define separate latent factors. This pattern of results suggests that a major part of the reliable variance of cognitive bias tasks is unique, and implies that a one-factor model of rational behavior is not plausible."
}

@inproceedings{Arnott2001ATO,
  title={A Taxonomy of Decision Biases},
  author={D. Arnott},
  year={2001}
}


@article{Carter2007,
author = {Carter, Craig and Kaufmann, Lutz and Michel, Alex},
year = {2007},
month = {09},
pages = {},
title = {Behavioral Supply Management: A Taxonomy of Judgment and Decision-Making Biases},
volume = {37},
journal = {International Journal of Physical Distribution \& Logistics Management},
doi = {10.1108/09600030710825694}
}


@article{Zhang2002,
author = {Zhang, Jiajie and Patel, Vimla and Johnson, Todd and Shortliffe, Edward},
year = {2002},
month = {02},
pages = {934-8},
title = {Toward a cognitive taxonomy of medical errors},
journal = {Proceedings / AMIA ... Annual Symposium. AMIA Symposium}
}


@book{bratman1987intention,
  title={Intention, plans, and practical reason},
  author={Bratman, Michael and others},
  volume={10},
  year={1987},
  publisher={Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA}
}

@article{Herzig2016,
author = {Herzig, Andreas and Lorini, Emiliano and Perrussel, Laurent and Xiao, Zhanhao},
year = {2016},
month = {10},
pages = {},
title = {BDI Logics for BDI Architectures: Old Problems, New Perspectives},
volume = {31},
journal = {KI - Künstliche Intelligenz},
doi = {10.1007/s13218-016-0457-5}
}


@article{cohen1990intention,
  title={Intention is choice with commitment},
  author={Cohen, Philip R and Levesque, Hector J},
  journal={Artificial intelligence},
  volume={42},
  number={2-3},
  pages={213--261},
  year={1990},
  publisher={Elsevier}
}

@inproceedings{Rao1991ModelingRA,
  title={Modeling Rational Agents within a BDI-Architecture},
  author={Anand Srinivasa Rao and M. Georgeff},
  booktitle={KR},
  year={1991}
}

@article{Shoham2009LogicalTO,
  title={Logical Theories of Intention and the Database Perspective},
  author={Y. Shoham},
  journal={Journal of Philosophical Logic},
  year={2009},
  volume={38},
  pages={633-647}
}

@inproceedings{arnaud:hal-01561962,
  TITLE = {{Les limites du BDI pour rendre compte du comportement humain en situation de crise}},
  AUTHOR = {Arnaud, Ma{\"e}l and Adam, Carole and Dugdale, Julie},
  URL = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01561962},
  BOOKTITLE = {{Rencontres des Jeunes Chercheurs en Intelligence Artificielle (RJCIA 2017)}},
  ADDRESS = {Caen, France},
  YEAR = {2017},
  MONTH = Jul,
  PDF = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01561962/file/Arnaud_RJCIA_2017.pdf},
  HAL_ID = {hal-01561962},
  HAL_VERSION = {v1},
}
  
  
@article{MAKINSON1997,
author = {MAKINSON, DAVID},
title = {Screened revision},
journal = {Theoria},
volume = {63},
number = {1‐2},
pages = {14-23},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1997.tb00737.x},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1997.tb00737.x},
eprint = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1997.tb00737.x},
year = {1997}
}

@article{Feme1999,
author = {Fermé, Eduardo and Hansson, Sven Ove},
year = {1999},
month = {11},
pages = {331-342},
title = {Selective Revision.},
volume = {63},
journal = {Studia Logica},
doi = {10.1023/A:1005294718935}
}

@article{Hansson1997,
author = { Sven   Hansson },
title = {Semi-revision},
journal = {Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics},
volume = {7},
number = {1-2},
pages = {151-175},
year  = {1997},
publisher = {Taylor & Francis},
doi = {10.1080/11663081.1997.10510904},

URL = { 
        https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.1997.10510904
    
},
eprint = { 
        https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.1997.10510904
    
}

}

@article{Levi1977SubjunctivesDA,
  title={Subjunctives, dispositions and chances},
  author={I. Levi},
  journal={Synthese},
  year={1977},
  volume={34},
  pages={303-335}
}

@article{Harper1976,
 ISSN = {02708647},
 URL = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/192397},
 author = {William L. Harper},
 journal = {PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association},
 pages = {462--494},
 publisher = {[University of Chicago Press, Springer, Philosophy of Science Association]},
 title = {Rational Conceptual Change},
 volume = {1976},
 year = {1976}
}

@book{wojcicki2013theory,
  title={Theory of logical calculi: basic theory of consequence operations},
  author={W{\'o}jcicki, Ryszard},
  volume={199},
  year={2013},
  publisher={Springer Science \& Business Media}
}


