High DPI Support in wxWidgets       {#overview_high_dpi}
=============================
[TOC]

Introduction                        {#high_dpi_intro}
============

Many modern displays have way more pixels on the same surface than used to be
the norm, resulting in much higher values of DPI (dots, i.e. pixels, per inch)
than the traditionally used values. This allows to render texts, or geometric
shapes in general much more smoothly.

As an illustration here are two scaled up views of the same text in 11 pt
Helvetica using up the same space on screen. First on an original Mac display
at 72 dpi, then on a High DPI Display, called "Retina" by Apple with twice as
many pixels in both dimensions (144 dpi), thus 4 times the number of pixels on
the same surface. Using these the contours are much more detailed.

![11 pt Helvetica at 72 DPI](overview_highdpi_text_72.png)

![11 pt Helvetica at 144 DPI](overview_highdpi_text_144.png)

To the user the DPI is typically expressed using a scaling factor, by which the
baseline DPI value is multiplied. For example, MSW systems may use 125% or 150%
scaling, meaning that they use DPI of 120 or 144 respectively, as baseline DPI
value is 96. Similarly, Linux systems may use "2x" scaling, resulting in DPI
value of 192. Macs are slightly different, as even they also may use "2x"
scaling, as in the example above, the effective DPI corresponding to it is 144,
as the baseline value on this platform is 72.


The Problem with High DPI Displays
----------------------------------

If high DPI displays were treated in the same way as normal ones, existing
applications would look tiny of them. For example, a square window 500 pixels
in size would take half of a standard 1920×1080 ("Full HD") display vertically,
but only a quarter on a 3840×2160 ("4K UHD") display. To prevent this from
happening, most platforms automatically scale the windows by the scaling
factor, defined above, when displaying them on high DPI displays. In this
example, scaling factor is 2 and so the actual size of the window on screen
would become 1000 when automatic scaling is in effect.

Automatic scaling is convenient, but doesn't really allow the application to
use the extra pixels available on the display. Visually, this means that the
scaled application appears blurry, in contrast to sharper applications using
the full display resolution, so a better solution for interpreting pixel values
on high DPI displays is needed: one which allows to scale some pixel values
(e.g. the total window size), but not some other ones (e.g. those used for
drawing, which should remain unscaled to use the full available resolution).


Pixel Values in wxWidgets           {#high_dpi_pixel_types}
=========================

Logical and Device-Independent Pixels {#high_dpi_lp_and_dip}
-------------------------------------

Some systems like eg Apple's OSes automatically scale all the coordinates by
the DPI scaling factor, however not all systems supported by wxWidgets do it --
notably, MSW does not. This means that **logical pixels**, in which all
coordinates and sizes are expressed in wxWidgets API, do _not_ have the same
meaning on all platforms when using high DPI displays. So while on macOS you
can always pass in a size of (500,500) to create the window from the previous
paragraph, whatever the resolution of the display is, you would have to
increase this to (1000,1000) on MSW when working on a 200% display. To hide
this difference from the application, wxWidgets provides **device-independent
pixels**, abbreviated as "DIP", that are always of the same size on all
displays and all platforms.

Thus, the first thing do when preparing your application for high DPI support
is to stop using raw pixel values, as they mean different things under
different platforms when DPI scaling is used. Actually, using any pixel values
is not recommended and replacing them with the values based on the text
metrics, i.e. obtained using wxWindow::GetTextExtent(), or expressing them in
dialog units (see wxWindow::ConvertDialogToPixels()) is preferable. However
the simplest change is to just replace the pixel values with the values in
DIP: for this, just use wxWindow::FromDIP() to convert from one to the other.

For example, if you have the existing code:
~~~{cpp}
myFrame->SetClientSize(wxSize(400, 300));
~~~
you can just replace it with
~~~{cpp}
myFrame->SetClientSize(myFrame->FromDIP(wxSize(400, 300)));
~~~
although replacing it with something like
~~~{cpp}
const wxSize sizeM = myFrame->GetTextExtent("M");
myFrame->SetClientSize(100*sizeM.x, 40*sizeM.y));
~~~
might be even better.

In any case, remember that window and wxDC or wxGraphicsContext coordinates
must be in logical pixels that can depend on the current DPI scaling, and so
should never be fixed at compilation time.


Physical Pixels                     {#high_dpi_pp}
---------------

In addition to (logical) pixels and DIPs discussed above, you may also need to
work in physical pixel coordinates, corresponding to the actual display pixels.
Physical pixels are never scaled, on any platform, and are used for the real
bitmap sizes. They are also used for drawing operations on wxGLCanvas, which
is _different_ from wxDC and wxGraphicsContext that use logical pixels.

Under MSW physical pixels are same as logical ones, but when writing portable
code you need to convert between logical and physical pixels. This can be done
using convenience wxWindow::FromPhys() and wxWindow::ToPhys() functions
similar to the DIP functions above or by directly multiplying or dividing by
wxWindow::GetContentScaleFactor(): this function returns a value greater than
or equal to 1 (and always just 1 under MSW), so a value in logical pixels
needs to be multiplied by it in order to obtain the value in physical pixels.

For example, in a wxGLCanvas created with the size of 100 (logical) pixels, the
rightmost physical pixel coordinate will be `100*GetContentScaleFactor()`
under all platforms.

You can convert from DIPs to physical pixels by converting DIPs to the logical
pixels first, but you can also do it directly, by using
wxWindow::GetDPIScaleFactor(). This function can return a value different from
1 even under MSW, i.e. it returns DPI scaling for physical display pixels.

**Warning:** It is possible that conversion between different pixel
coordinates is not lossless due to rounding. E.g. to create a window big
enough to show a bitmap 15 pixels wide, you need to use `FromPhys(15)`,
however the exact result of this function is not representable as an `int`
when using 200% DPI scaling. In this case, the value is always rounded
upwards, i.e. the function returns `8`, to ensure that a window of this size
in logical pixels is always big enough to show the bitmap, but this can only
be done at the price of having one "extra" pixel in the window.


Summary of Different Pixel Kinds    {#high_dpi_pixel_conversions}
--------------------------------

Under MSW, logical pixels are always the same as physical pixels, but are
different from DIPs, while under all the other platforms with DPI scaling
support (currently only GTK 3 and macOS), logical pixels are the same as DIP,
but different from physical pixels.

However under all platforms the following functions can be used to convert
between different kinds of pixels:

* From DIP to logical pixels: use wxWindow::FromDIP() or wxWindow::ToDIP().
* From physical to logical pixels: use wxWindow::FromPhys() or wxWindow::ToPhys().
* From DIP to physical pixels: multiply or divide by wxWindow::GetDPIScaleFactor().

Or, in the diagram form:

@dot
digraph Pixels
{
    node [shape = hexagon, style = filled, fontname = Helvetica];

    LP  [fillcolor = lightblue, label = "Logical\nPixels"];
    DIP [fillcolor = yellow, label = "DI\nPixels"];
    PP  [fillcolor = green, label = "Physical\nPixels"];

    LP  -> PP [fontname = Helvetica, labeldistance = 5, labelangle = 30, dir = both, weight = 2, minlen = 3, headlabel = "ToPhys()", taillabel = "FromPhys()"];
    LP -> DIP [fontname = Helvetica, labeldistance = 6, dir = both, weight = 2, minlen = 3, headlabel = "ToDIP()", taillabel = "FromDIP()"];
    DIP -> PP [fontname = Helvetica, dir = both, minlen = 10, label = "GetDPIScaleFactor()" headlabel = "multiply by", taillabel = "divide by", constraint = false] ;
}
@enddot


Almost all functions in wxWidgets API take and return values expressed in
logical pixels. With the obvious exceptions of the functions that explicitly
use "Logical", "Physical" or "DIP" in their names, the only exceptions are:

- Size passed to wxBitmap constructors taking one, as well as the size returned
  by wxBitmap::GetWidth() and wxBitmap::GetHeight() is in physical pixels. You
  can use wxBitmap::CreateWithDIPSize() and wxBitmap::GetDIPSize() or
  wxBitmap::GetLogicalSize() to use or get the size in DPI-independent or
  logical pixels (notably, the latter must be used in any computations
  involving the sizes expressed in logical units).
- Similarly, the size returned by wxBitmapBundle::GetPreferredBitmapSizeFor()
  is in physical pixels, but wxBitmapBundle::GetPreferredLogicalSizeFor() can
  be used to retrieve the same value in logical units.
- The default size of wxBitmapBundle, taken by wxBitmapBundle::FromSVG() and
  returned by wxBitmapBundle::GetDefaultSize() is in DIPs.


High-Resolution Images and Artwork  {#high_dpi_artwork}
==================================

In order to really benefit from the increased detail on High DPI devices you need
to provide the images or artwork your application uses in higher resolutions as
well. Note that it is not recommended to just provide a high-resolution version
and let the system scale that down on 1x displays. Apart from performance
consideration also the quality might suffer, contours become more blurry, so
for best results it is recommended to use the images that can be used without
scaling at the common DPI values, i.e. at least 100% and 200% scaling. If you
don't want providing several copies of all bitmaps, you can use a single
vector image in [SVG format][] instead.

[SVG format]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalable_Vector_Graphics

In either case, you must use wxBitmapBundle class representing several
different versions of the same bitmap (or even potentially just a single one,
which makes it upwards-compatible with wxBitmap). Most functions accepting
wxBitmap or wxImage in wxWidgets API have been updated to work with
wxBitmapBundle instead, which allows the library to select the appropriate
size depending on the current DPI and, for the platforms supporting it
(currently only MSW and macOS), even update the bitmap automatically if the
DPI changes, as can happen, for example, when the window showing the bitmap is
moved to another monitor with a different resolution.

Note that other than creating wxBitmapBundle instead of wxBitmap, no other
changes are needed. Moreover, when upgrading the existing code it is possible
to replace some wxBitmap objects by wxBitmapBundle while keeping the others.

Using Multiple Bitmaps              {#high_dpi_bundle_bitmaps}
----------------------

When using multiple bitmaps, the simplest way to create a wxBitmapBundle is to
do it from a vector of bitmaps of different sizes. In the most common case of
just two bitmaps, a special constructor taking these bitmaps directly can be
used rather than having to construct a vector from them:

~~~{cpp}
wxBitmap normal(32, 32);
wxBitmap highDPI(64, 64);
... initialize the bitmaps somehow ...
wxBitmapBundle bundle = wxBitmapBundle::FromBitmaps(normal, highDPI);

// Now the bundle can be passed to any wxWidgets control using bitmaps.
~~~

For the platforms where it is common to embed bitmaps in the resources, it is
possible to use wxBitmapBundle::FromResources() to create a bundle containing
all bitmaps using the given base name, i.e. `foo` for the normal bitmap and
`foo_2x` for the bitmap for 200% scaling (for fractional values decimal
separator must be replaced with underscore, e.g. use `foo_1_5x` for the bitmap
to use 150% scaling).

It is also possible to create wxBitmapBundle from the files using the same
naming convention with wxBitmapBundle::FromFiles(). And, to abstract the
differences between the platforms using resources and the other ones, a helper
wxBITMAP_BUNDLE_2() macro which uses resources if possible or files otherwise
is provided, similar to wxBITMAP_PNG() macro for plain bitmaps.

Independently of the way in which the bundle was created, it will provide the
bitmap closest in size to the expected size at the current DPI, while trying
to avoid having scale it. This means that at 175% DPI scaling, for example,
the high DPI (i.e. double-sized) bitmap will be used _without_ scaling rather
than scaling it by 0.875, which almost certainly wouldn't look good. However
if the current DPI scaling is 300%, the 2x bitmap will be scaled, if it's the
closest one available, as using it without scaling would result in bitmaps too
small to use. The cut-off for the decision whether to scale bitmap or use an
existing one without scaling is the factor of 1.5: if the mismatch between the
required and closest available size is equal or greater than 1.5, the bitmap
will be scaled. Otherwise it will be used in its natural size.

If this behaviour is inappropriate for your application, it is also possible
to define a custom wxBitmapBundle implementation, see wxBitmapBundleImpl for
more details.

Using Vector Graphics               {#high_dpi_bundle_vector}
---------------------

As an alternative to providing multiple versions of the bitmaps, it is
possible to use a single SVG image and create the bitmap bundle using either
wxBitmapBundle::FromSVG() or wxBitmapBundle::FromSVGFile(). Such bitmap
bundles will always produce bitmaps of exactly the required size, at any
resolution. At normal DPI, i.e. without any scaling, the size of the resulting
bitmap will be the default bundle size, which must be provided when creating
this kind of bitmap bundle, as SVG image itself doesn't necessarily contain
this information.

Note that wxWidgets currently uses [NanoSVG][] library for SVG support and so
doesn't support all SVG standard features and you may need to simplify or
tweak the SVG files to make them appear correctly.

[NanoSVG]: https://github.com/memononen/nanosvg

wxBitmapBundle and XRC              {#high_dpi_bundle_xrc}
----------------------

XRC format has been updated to allow specifying wxBitmapBundle with
`<bitmaps>` tag in all the places where wxBitmap could be specified using
`<bitmap>` before (of course, using the latter tag is still supported). Either
multiple bitmaps or a single SVG image can be used.


Adapting Existing Code To High DPI  {#high_dpi_existing_code}
==================================

Generally speaking, adding support for high DPI to the existing wxWidgets
programs involves doing at least the following:

1. Not using any hard-coded pixel values outside of `FromDIP()` (note that
   this does _not_ apply to XRC).
2. Using wxBitmapBundle containing at least 2 (normal and high DPI) bitmaps
   instead of wxBitmap and wxImageList when setting bitmaps.
3. Updating any custom art providers to override
   wxArtProvider::CreateBitmapBundle() (and, of course, return multiple bitmaps
   from it) instead of wxArtProvider::CreateBitmap().
4. Removing any calls to wxToolBar::SetToolBitmapSize() or, equivalently,
   `<bitmapsize>` attributes from the XRC, as this overrides the best size
   determination and may result in suboptimal appearance.



Platform-Specific Build Issues      {#high_dpi_platform_specific}
==============================

Some platforms handle applications not specifically marked as
being "DPI-aware" by emulating low-resolution display for them and scaling them
up, resulting in blurry graphics and fonts, but globally preserving the
application appearance. For the best results, the application needs to be
explicitly marked as DPI-aware in a platform-dependent way.

MSW                                 {#high_dpi_platform_msw}
---

The behaviour of the application when running on a high-DPI display depends on
the values in its [manifest][msw-manifest]. You may either use your own
manifest, in which case you need to define the `dpiAware` (for compatibility
with older OS versions) and `dpiAwareness` (for proper per-monitor DPI support)
in it, or use a manifest provided by wxWidgets in one of the ways explained in
the [manifests documentation](@ref msw_manifest).

Note that `wx_dpi_aware_pmv2.manifest` file and `wxUSE_DPI_AWARE_MANIFEST=2`
documented there correspond to full, per-monitor DPI awareness supported by
Windows 10 version 1703 or later. It is also possible to use
`wx_dpi_aware.manifest` and set `wxUSE_DPI_AWARE_MANIFEST=1` to enable minimal
support for system DPI, see [MSDN documentation][msw-highdpi] for more
information about different levels of DPI awareness.

[msw-highdpi]: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/hidpi/high-dpi-desktop-application-development-on-windows

macOS                               {#high_dpi_platform_mac}
-----

DPI-aware applications must set their `NSPrincipalClass` to `wxNSApplication`
(or at least `NSApplication`) in their `Info.plist` file. Also see Apple [high
resolution guidelines][apple-highdpi] for more information.

[apple-highdpi]: https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/GraphicsAnimation/Conceptual/HighResolutionOSX/Explained/Explained.html

GTK                                 {#high_dpi_platform_gtk}
---

GTK 3 doesn't require anything special to be done and, in fact, doesn't support
scaling the application up automatically, i.e. all applications are DPI-aware.
However wxGTK only supports integer scaling factors currently and fractional
scales are rounded to the closest integer.

Older GTK 2 doesn't support application-level DPI-awareness at all and only
supports scaling them up globally on high DPI displays by setting `GDK_SCALE`
or `GDK_DPI_SCALE` environment variables.
